Yuyun Lusiyani
A groundbreaking investigation has uncovered a disturbing pattern of U.S. citizens being unlawfully detained, subjected to excessive force, and even deported by federal immigration agents during the Trump administration, directly contradicting official assurances. This extensive review, meticulously cataloging over 500 such incidents between January 2025 and September 2026, reveals a systemic disregard for constitutional protections, particularly impacting communities of color across the nation.
The findings paint a stark picture of an immigration enforcement apparatus operating with broad discretion, often at the expense of American citizens’ civil liberties. From individuals asserting their citizenship during routine stops to those documenting agent activity, the investigation details a wide array of encounters where basic rights were allegedly violated. This comprehensive tally underscores a critical erosion of safeguards that experts have long warned would inevitably follow aggressive immigration crackdowns.
The Scale of the Crisis: Over 500 Cases Documented
The investigation’s core finding is the identification of more than 500 instances where U.S. citizens were held against their will by immigration agents. These incidents range from brief detentions to prolonged incarcerations and even deportations. A closer look at the data reveals alarming trends:
- Questioned Citizenship: More than 100 Americans, predominantly people of color, were detained after agents challenged their citizenship status, despite their assertions.
- Child Detentions: At least 70 American children and teenagers were held, with approximately 20 reported to have been handcuffed or zip-tied.
- Allegations of Obstruction and Assault: Over 300 Americans were detained for allegedly assaulting or obstructing agents. However, fewer than half of these individuals were formally charged in federal court, and a significant number of those cases were subsequently dropped or dismissed, suggesting questionable grounds for initial detention.
- Suppression of Documentation: At least 63 Americans were detained while attempting to record or document agent activities, raising concerns about First Amendment infringements.
- Lack of Due Process: 36 Americans were held for at least 24 hours without the ability to contact a lawyer or their families, severely impeding their right to legal counsel and communication.
- Deportation of Citizens: Roughly a dozen citizens, primarily children, were deported, often with their parents, while one American adult was also unlawfully removed from the country.
These statistics collectively illustrate that the relentless pursuit of undocumented immigrants by the administration has frequently led to federal agents overstepping constitutional boundaries and impacting citizens.
Official Denials Versus Documented Reality
Despite the overwhelming evidence, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Trump administration consistently issued categorical denials regarding these practices. Statements from officials included claims such as: "DHS is NOT arresting U.S. citizens by mistake," "There are no ‘indiscriminate’ stops," and "Allegations of ‘racial profiling are disgusting, reckless and categorically FALSE.’" Furthermore, the administration asserted, "The pattern is NOT of law enforcement using force," and "ICE does not zip tie or restrain children."
However, the detailed findings of this investigation directly refute these assertions. Former immigration officials, upon reviewing the incidents, expressed profound dismay. Eric Balliet, who served over two decades with Homeland Security Investigations and Border Patrol, including during President Donald Trump’s first administration, remarked, "This is just terrible. I’ve never seen so many U.S. citizen encounters in all my years." Darius Reeves, who previously oversaw the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency’s Baltimore office, called the situation "an embarrassment." These reactions from seasoned professionals underscore the gravity and unprecedented nature of the documented incidents.
A Chronology of Encounters: Specific Incidents Highlight Systemic Issues
The investigation compiled a chronological record of incidents that illustrate the diverse ways in which citizens’ rights were allegedly violated:
Mistaken Identity and Racial Profiling
Several cases highlight how perceived ethnicity or association with immigrants led to citizen detentions. In January 2026, an employee at a Target store in Richfield, Minnesota, was detained, reportedly exclaiming, "I’m literally a U.S. citizen." Similarly, a woman in Key Largo, Florida, was detained for the third time while driving a car registered to her immigrant partner, pleading, "I’m a U.S. citizen, please help me."
Willy Wender Aceituno, a naturalized citizen and two-time Trump voter, recounted a harrowing experience in November, when Border Patrol agents allegedly broke his truck window, forcibly removed him, and knelt on his back in a parking lot. Aceituno, who had supported the administration’s immigration policies, stated, "ICE isn’t looking for criminals. They’re looking for Latinos. Having papers in this country does not protect you." His U.S.-born daughter now carries her passport at college, a stark contrast to her "white friends" who do not feel the same necessity, illustrating the chilling effect of racial profiling. The Supreme Court’s Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a concurring opinion, stated that agents could consider factors like "apparent ethnicity" in stops, a stance critics argue has fueled such discriminatory practices.
Home Invasions and Unlawful Entry
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures, specifically prohibiting officers from entering homes without a judicial warrant. Yet, the investigation uncovered multiple instances of agents allegedly disregarding this fundamental right. A whistleblower this year revealed an ICE memo indicating that agents were using administrative warrants, which do not involve a judge, to force their way into homes.
In January, Jeyli Salguero and her family were asleep in their Minneapolis home when armed federal agents reportedly broke down their front door. Salguero, a U.S. citizen, immediately asserted her right to record, only for her phone to be snatched away. The agents, looking for her brother who did not reside there, detained her father (who had temporary protected status) and her undocumented sister, ultimately leading to her sister’s deportation. Salguero and her mother were left in their damaged home, the broken door exposing them to the harsh Minneapolis winter. Salguero is among several plaintiffs who have filed a lawsuit against the government for these unconstitutional home entries, though DHS has moved to dismiss the suit, claiming it has "paused" the policy.
Excessive Force and Obstruction Allegations
Numerous incidents involved agents using force against citizens, often under the guise of obstruction. In October, Darren Eichler was working at a Christian cemetery in a Chicago suburb when he and coworkers attempted to assist a man fleeing immigration agents. When they refused agents access to a gated area and began filming, agents reportedly used bolt cutters to breach the gate, then fired pepper balls and tackled the men. Eichler, whose face felt "like it was on fire," pleaded for an ambulance for an hour while still handcuffed. No charges were filed against the men.
Other examples include an 18-year-old citizen picked up off the street in November and "dumped him in the woods," and a New York teen in May who was thrown to the ground, bloodied, and left in an unfamiliar neighborhood. In January, a school staffer in Minneapolis was tackled and handcuffed by agents hours after a local killing, recalling, "I feel lucky to be alive." While DHS maintains that obstructing agents will face consequences, the high rate of dropped charges in alleged assault/obstruction cases suggests that many detentions were unwarranted. Oriana Korol, a clarinet player, was initially charged with felony assault during a peaceful protest after agents allegedly shoved and pepper-sprayed her twice, eventually pleading guilty to a misdemeanor for trying to kick an officer. Video footage shows agents pulling her tear-gas-soaked mask over her mouth despite her pleas about asthma.
Detention of Children and Families
The investigation highlighted the alarming detention of American children. In 2025, a 15-year-old with disabilities was handcuffed outside a Los Angeles school, agents claiming they mistook him for a gang member. A few months later, more than a dozen American children were detained during a raid on an Idaho horse track. Anabel Romero shared how her 7-year-old son, traumatized by the experience, now warns his older sister to "Watch out for ICE, make sure you have your phone to film – I’ll come save you." Despite DHS’s denial of zip-tying or restraining children, the evidence points to these practices occurring.
Deportation of Citizens
Perhaps the most egregious violations involved the deportation of U.S. citizens. About a dozen American children were deported with their parents, often against the parents’ objections. In April, Brian Morales Garcia, an American adult in Texas, was pulled over, disbelieved about his citizenship, and denied access to his birth certificate. He was held for four days without legal or family contact before being deported to Mexico. Only after suing was Morales Garcia allowed to return, using his birth certificate as proof of citizenship. DHS disputed his citizenship in earlier court filings, claiming he admitted to being born in Mexico, a claim Morales Garcia vehemently denies, recalling his assertion to officers: "I’m a citizen, it’s fine."
Broader Impact and Implications for Civil Liberties
The systematic nature of these incidents, affecting over 500 citizens, points to a profound crisis in civil liberties during the Trump administration’s tenure. The targeting of individuals based on "apparent ethnicity," the disregard for Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful entry and excessive force, the suppression of First Amendment rights to record and protest, and the denial of due process culminating in the deportation of citizens, collectively signal a dangerous shift in federal law enforcement practices.
Experts have consistently warned that any erosion of rights for immigrants inevitably paves the way for the erosion of rights for citizens. This investigation serves as a stark validation of those warnings, demonstrating that when a government agency is empowered to act with diminished oversight in one area, its reach can expand to compromise the fundamental rights of all. The sentiment expressed by Willy Wender Aceituno—"Having papers in this country does not protect you"—resonates as a chilling implication for the future of civil rights.
The ongoing legal challenges, such as the lawsuit filed by Jeyli Salguero and others against DHS, are critical in seeking accountability and potentially reforming policies that have led to these widespread abuses. The meticulous documentation by the investigative team, scouring social media, court records, and local media, serves as an essential counter-narrative to official denials, providing tangible evidence of a pattern of misconduct. The fact that the recorded incidents are likely an undercount further emphasizes the pervasive nature of the problem, with many cases potentially remaining unreported or undocumented.
As the nation grapples with the legacy of these immigration policies, the imperative for transparency, accountability, and a renewed commitment to constitutional protections for all individuals within U.S. borders becomes ever more pressing. The documented experiences of these 500+ citizens serve as a sobering reminder of the fragility of civil liberties when unchecked power is exercised by government agencies.
Ana Megawati
Joko Widodo
Eva Lovia
Jia Lissa
Pevita Pearce