Yuyun Lusiyani
Rebecca Sheppard, a Colorado accountant whose professional life revolves around untangling financial knots, found herself ensnared in a personal one she couldn’t resolve for nearly a year. A glaring, erroneous $240,000 student loan debt, belonging to her ex-husband, appeared on her credit report, plummeting her credit score by approximately 85 points. Despite submitting extensive documentation to the nation’s "big three" credit reporting companies — TransUnion, Experian, and Equifax — and even receiving confirmation from the loan’s account manager that she was not responsible, the bureaus steadfastly refused to remove the debt. This persistent error jeopardized her crucial plans to move into a more accessible home with her disabled father, rendering her unable to qualify for a mortgage. Sheppard’s plight is not an isolated incident but a vivid illustration of a systemic breakdown in consumer protection, exacerbated by a dramatically curtailed Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under the Trump administration, which has seen two of the three major credit bureaus sharply reduce their rates of resolving consumer complaints in customers’ favor.
A System Designed to Protect, Now Under Strain
For years, the federal government, primarily through the CFPB, was intended to be the bulwark against such consumer injustices. Established in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, the CFPB was tasked with safeguarding Americans from unfair, deceptive, and abusive financial practices. Its mandate included rigorous oversight of credit reporting agencies, wielding the threat of substantial fines and lawsuits to compel companies to correct errors and engage meaningfully with consumers. Under the Biden administration, a staunch supporter of the agency, consumers’ rates of relief for complaints surged, reaching approximately ten times the levels seen in 2020. This robust enforcement environment fostered a degree of accountability among credit bureaus, ensuring that legitimate disputes were addressed.
However, Sheppard’s struggle unfolded during a period when the CFPB’s mission was drastically curtailed. A ProPublica analysis of federal complaint data reveals a stark decline in consumer relief rates from TransUnion and Experian. TransUnion’s relief rate, which had remained relatively stable for several years, began a steep plunge in the summer of 2025, providing relief roughly half as often by October of that year. Experian’s decline was even more dramatic, with the company resolving nearly 20% of complaints in consumers’ favor in 2024, only for that figure to plummet to less than 1% last year. These figures, current as of February 23, 2026, paint a concerning picture of diminished corporate responsibility in the absence of stringent regulatory oversight.
The Political Pivot and its Consequences
The timing of these declines directly correlates with the Trump administration’s concerted efforts to dismantle and weaken the CFPB. In February 2025, Russell Vought, a White House official known for overseeing sweeping cuts across federal agencies, assumed control of the CFPB as acting director. His tenure was marked by an immediate halt to nearly all agency work, including freezing investigations and dropping enforcement actions, notably against TransUnion. The administration also saw the appointment of new legal advisors within the CFPB who had previously represented the very industries the agency was designed to regulate; one such lawyer, Victoria Dorfman, had represented Experian for years before joining the administration, although she has reportedly recused herself from active cases involving her former client.
Consumer advocates argue that this shift created an environment where credit bureaus felt less pressure to act in consumers’ best interests. Chi Chi Wu, director of consumer reporting at the National Consumer Law Center, a plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging some of the administration’s dismantling efforts, stated plainly, "The credit bureaus want to do as little as possible. The thing that is making them do any kind of effort is a lawsuit or a regulator, and now we don’t have the regulator."
A Tale of Three Bureaus: Divergent Paths
Amidst the widespread decline, Equifax presents a notable exception. Its consumer relief rates largely kept pace with incoming complaints. This divergence can be traced back to a specific regulatory intervention. Just days before President Donald Trump’s inauguration in January 2025, Equifax entered into a consent order with the CFPB following an enforcement action. The company settled, agreeing to pay $15 million and operate under a legally binding agreement designed to rectify its deficient dispute and investigation practices. This agreement mandated reforms, including improvements to its web interface for dispute submissions, a commitment to avoid relying on faulty information from creditors, and a pledge not to automatically dismiss repeated concerns from the same consumer. Equifax was given approximately a year to implement these changes and is bound by the consent order for five years, demonstrating the long-term impact of sustained regulatory pressure.
In contrast, similar enforcement actions against TransUnion and Experian either stalled or faced vigorous opposition. ProPublica found that a CFPB-approved action against TransUnion in July 2024 was never brought, with settlement talks ceasing shortly after the change in administration. TransUnion explicitly acknowledged this pause in a February 2025 Securities and Exchange Commission filing, stating, "Given recent changes in CFPB leadership, our engagement with the agency on this matter has paused. We cannot provide an estimate of when, or if, such engagement will resume." That same month, the CFPB dropped a lawsuit against TransUnion and a former executive concerning alleged deceptive practices and later ended an agreement meant to address the company’s failure to promptly manage credit freezes. Similarly, the CFPB sued Experian shortly before the administration change, alleging failures in its dispute handling processes. Experian vehemently denied these allegations, calling the suit "completely without merit" and asserting that it investigates "every consumer dispute thoroughly." The case remains active.
Credit Bureaus’ Stance and Systemic Challenges
The credit bureaus have defended their practices, arguing that a significant portion of complaints are illegitimate, often filed by "credit repair organizations" that charge consumers to challenge accurate negative information. Experian stated that some of these companies "mislead consumers into believing they can remove accurate information," while asserting its commitment to investigating "all legitimate" complaints. TransUnion also noted a change in its processes for handling third-party complaints, redirecting those with "insufficient documentation" to "a more appropriate" internal channel.
However, federal regulators and a House subcommittee have pointed out that the credit bureaus’ systems for identifying third-party involvement are often overly broad, leading to the dismissal of legitimate concerns. While third parties are legally permitted to submit complaints on behalf of consumers with proper disclosure and permission, the industry’s lobbying arm, the Consumer Data Industry Association (CDIA), has successfully pushed the Trump administration to steer consumers away from the CFPB’s transparent complaint system and towards the bureaus’ internal, less visible processes. This year, just a week after receiving a letter from the CDIA, the CFPB added new notices to its public complaint portal, warning consumers that their requests might be ignored if they hadn’t first disputed issues directly with the credit bureaus – a standard the agency itself previously deemed unreliable for verification by companies. The CDIA defended these changes as "necessary to address the widespread misuse of the portal" that diverts resources from legitimate concerns, while consumer advocates contend they create additional obstacles for individuals seeking redress.
The Human Cost: More Than Just Numbers
The impact of a weakened CFPB and less responsive credit bureaus is profoundly felt by individual Americans. Since Trump’s inauguration in January 2025, over 2.7 million credit reporting complaints submitted to the CFPB have gone without relief. This leaves countless individuals vulnerable to being denied crucial loans, housing, or employment, and subject to higher rates from insurers and lenders, all due to errors they cannot correct.
Beyond Rebecca Sheppard’s struggle, other cases highlight this crisis. An anonymized complaint from a Texan detailed a fraudulent account that persisted on their credit report despite repeated disputes, jeopardizing "an important deal that I need to complete that is important for the safety and survival of my family." In this instance, CFPB records show Equifax provided relief, but TransUnion and Experian did not. Kwami Abdul-Bey, an Air Force veteran and elections organizer in Arkansas, recounted how the bureaus erroneously deleted his mortgage history, preventing him from refinancing his home or car. "Each time they tell me that I do not have enough years of credit. I was paying on that mortgage for a decade before that trade line disappeared," he explained. Only after ProPublica contacted his mortgage servicer, Wells Fargo, did the company reach out to apologize and initiate an investigation.
These stories underscore a broader problem: everyday Americans have no option to opt out of having their financial data collected, analyzed, and sold by credit bureaus. While the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) of 1970 grants consumers the right to dispute and flag errors, the practical reality is often a labyrinthine process. Credit bureaus frequently employ a limited number of workers, often overseas, to handle an enormous volume of investigations. In 2021, TransUnion had only 171 workers addressing consumer disputes covering 38 million line items. While TransUnion claims to have since added staff, they have not provided specific numbers. Liam Hayden, a Chicago attorney specializing in credit reporting cases, notes, "These ‘investigators,’ they have a stack of disputes like a mile high that they have to go through every day. A real, authentic investigation costs money."
A Look Back and Forward
The CFPB’s complaint system, designed as a public middleman, has historically played a critical role in forwarding consumer issues, requiring responses, and publishing data on company performance. Complaints about Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian have consistently surged in recent years, vastly outnumbering all other complaint categories, such as credit cards, loans, or debt collection. In 2022, recognizing a chronic lack of responsiveness, the CFPB released a critical report detailing "consumer complaint response deficiencies" and issued guidance on addressing "shoddy investigation practices." These efforts led to rising relief rates as companies were compelled to provide more individualized responses.
However, the current regulatory environment has shifted the burden back to consumers. Without a robust and actively enforcing CFPB, the primary avenues for redress will increasingly fall to state attorneys general and private lawsuits. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can bring cases, but it lacks the authority for routine supervision that the CFPB once exercised. Liam Hayden grimly predicts a future where, "In five years, the resolution of consumer disputes is going to be worse, credit reports are going to be worse and it’s going to be harder for folks to fix them, guaranteed."
Rebecca Sheppard’s case exemplifies this dire prediction. After multiple direct disputes and a failed attempt through the CFPB (where all three bureaus claimed to have verified the debt without acknowledging her documentation), she sent a certified mail dispute in December, only for TransUnion to reply with a postcard stating it believed the submission had not come from her. "They didn’t even try," Sheppard lamented. "The fact that they sent that little postcard was just ridiculous." Despite including a letter from the loan account manager confirming her non-responsibility, TransUnion remained unyielding, stating it "cannot change information furnished to us absent sufficient documentation and clear instruction from the consumer." With no other options, Sheppard sued the three credit bureaus in January. As the legal battle unfolds, her experience stands as a testament to the profound challenges facing consumers when the mechanisms designed to protect them are systematically dismantled. The integrity of financial data, and the ability of ordinary Americans to navigate their economic lives, hangs in the balance.
Joko Widodo
Nila Kartika Wati
Lina Irawan
Jia Lissa
Pevita Pearce
Eva Lovia