Yuyun Lusiyani
New York, the nation’s largest sports betting market, has formally proposed two significant rules aimed at curbing gambling addiction, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over consumer protection in the rapidly expanding online wagering industry. The move by state gambling regulators on Friday follows months of internal deliberation and mounting public pressure, including scathing media investigations that exposed perceived weaknesses in the "responsible gaming" safeguards employed by major operators. These new regulations are poised to reshape how online sportsbooks interact with their customers, particularly those exhibiting signs of problematic betting behavior, and could set a precedent for other states grappling with the social costs of legalized gambling.
The Genesis of Regulatory Action: A Booming Market and Rising Concerns
The landscape of sports betting in the United States underwent a dramatic transformation following the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision to overturn the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA). This landmark ruling cleared the path for individual states to legalize and regulate sports wagering, a liberalization that many quickly embraced, lured by the promise of significant tax revenues and the opportunity to bring a previously illicit activity into a regulated framework. New York was among the states to capitalize on this new era, launching mobile sports betting in January 2022. The market quickly exploded, generating billions in handle and hundreds of millions in tax revenue, establishing New York as a dominant force in the national sports betting ecosystem.
However, this unprecedented growth has not been without its shadows. Alongside the economic boon, there has been a notable surge in gambling disorder diagnoses. Research from EPIC Research, cited in the original reporting, indicates that diagnoses have risen by more than 60% in states that have legalized sports betting. This alarming statistic underscores the "harmful side effects" that regulators and public health advocates have increasingly warned about. The rapid proliferation of online platforms, aggressive marketing campaigns, and the ease of access via smartphones have created an environment where problem gambling can manifest quickly and severely, often without adequate intervention.
The proposed rules by the New York State Gaming Commission are a direct response to this escalating crisis. While the drafts had been under review for several months, their formal introduction was notably expedited in the wake of intense media scrutiny. A ProPublica investigation published last month, for instance, meticulously detailed significant flaws in the "responsible gaming" mechanisms ostensibly put in place by companies like DraftKings to identify and assist problem gamblers. The investigation revealed that despite exhibiting hallmark signs of compulsive betting, a reporter’s behavior did not trigger meaningful interventions beyond generic notices, raising serious questions about the efficacy of current industry-led safeguards.
The Proposed Regulations: A Dual Approach to Protection
New York’s regulatory framework introduces two primary rules designed to enhance consumer protection. The first rule mandates that sportsbooks adopt specific thresholds, mirroring those already in use in New Jersey, to identify at-risk bettors. Upon identification, companies would be legally required to proactively check in with these users. These thresholds, while potentially subject to refinement, currently include substantial activity markers such as depositing more than $10,000 within a 24-hour period or wagering over $1 million within a 90-day span. DraftKings, a prominent player in the market, has stated that it already adheres to these New Jersey-style triggers, suggesting a baseline for industry compliance.
The second, and perhaps more groundbreaking, rule would explicitly prohibit companies from utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) to customize bonuses or wagers. This measure directly addresses concerns highlighted by a separate investigation by The New York Times, which uncovered evidence of DraftKings leveraging AI and data scientists to tailor promotions specifically to "losing bettors." The implication was that advanced algorithmic tools were being used not to protect vulnerable individuals, but to maximize engagement and revenue, potentially exploiting those already prone to addiction. This prohibition seeks to sever the link between sophisticated data analytics and potentially predatory marketing practices, emphasizing player welfare over profit optimization.
Brian O’Dwyer, Chair of the New York State Gaming Commission, articulated the commission’s firm stance on the matter. "The industry is on notice by me and this commission that they need to solve this problem," O’Dwyer stated unequivocally. He warned, "If the industry does not address it, then we will address it and they may not like the solution that we come up with." This strong rhetoric underscores the commission’s determination to ensure genuine change, signaling a potential shift from industry self-regulation to more robust governmental oversight.
Industry Practices Under Fire: The Gap in "Responsible Gaming"
The ProPublica investigation served as a stark illustration of the inadequacies in the current "responsible gaming" systems. The reporter’s controlled experiment involved depositing $21,600 into a DraftKings account over less than eight weeks and deliberately engaging in compulsive betting patterns. Despite displaying clear indicators of problem gambling, the behavior fell below the thresholds for a company review or significant intervention. The only responses were generic responsible gaming notices, including in-app pop-ups, which proved insufficient to deter the simulated problematic play. Even more concerning, the journalist was elevated to VIP status by DraftKings, a designation often associated with high-value customers, even while exhibiting red flags of addiction.
Lori Kalani, DraftKings’ chief responsible gaming officer, defended the company’s protocols in an interview with ProPublica, asserting that "the system worked the way it was supposed to" during the investigation, citing over 30 messages sent to the reporter. She maintained that the industry is "doing a good job of educating people, of raising awareness, of making tools and resources available, of monitoring accounts." Similarly, in response to The New York Times’ reporting, DraftKings denied any implication that its marketing practices were unfair or targeted addicts, stating that perks were delivered to "customers who demonstrated sustained, engaged use on our platform, not toward customers based on their losses." These statements highlight the industry’s position that its current measures are adequate and that its practices are ethical, a perspective that stands in direct contrast to the findings of investigative journalism and the concerns of reform advocates.
Advocate Criticism and Acknowledged Limitations
Despite the perceived progress, many gambling reform advocates argue that New York’s proposed rules do not go far enough. Brianne Doura-Schawohl, a prominent advocate lobbying for consumer and public health protections, criticized both New York and New Jersey, stating they "are clearly complacent in the status quo by endorsing and prescribing regulations that are nothing more than giving the appearance of reform and not effectuating actual change." Her criticism suggests that the proposed thresholds, while a step, may still be too high to capture the majority of individuals struggling with problem gambling, which often manifests in smaller, yet equally destructive, amounts.
Commission Chair O’Dwyer himself acknowledged "the limitations of this proposal" after the rules were unanimously advanced. He urged the state’s nine licensed mobile sports betting companies to voluntarily share data, a crucial step that could prevent problem gamblers from evading intervention by simply moving between different platforms. This call for inter-operator cooperation highlights a significant challenge in the current fragmented regulatory landscape: a lack of a unified view of a player’s betting behavior across the entire market.
The Responsible Online Gaming Association (ROGA), a trade group representing major sportsbook operators including DraftKings and FanDuel, commented on earlier drafts of the rules. While acknowledging the framework as "strong," ROGA offered "targeted recommendations" to ensure the triggers "avoid displacing or disrupting the mature, data-driven behavioral risk assessment systems already in use" and to clarify the distinction between a company’s "responsible gaming role and the role of qualified clinicians." They emphasized that any interventions should be "proportionate, operationally scalable, and effective," indicating a desire to maintain operational flexibility while addressing regulatory concerns.
Broader Implications and a Shifting Regulatory Tide
New York’s actions are not occurring in isolation. The intensified scrutiny of online gambling practices, particularly the use of AI and the effectiveness of responsible gaming programs, is gaining traction across the nation. Regulators in Maine, Michigan, Massachusetts, and Maryland have all indicated they are reviewing issues raised by recent investigations.
A spokesperson for Maine’s Public Safety Department confirmed that its Gambling Control Unit is "monitoring the use of AI locally and nationally," though current laws do not specifically address it. Massachusetts regulators, already engaged in researching AI use by gambling companies, have also confirmed they are examining the reports. In Maryland, Governor Wes Moore has publicly expressed his desire to limit gambling companies’ use of AI to "identify and target users showing problem-gambling patterns," signaling a potential executive push for stricter controls. These concurrent developments suggest a growing recognition among state authorities of the need for more robust oversight of the burgeoning online gambling industry.
FanDuel, another major industry player, responded to the New York regulations by stating it "welcomes the opportunity to engage with regulators and work collaboratively to establish best practices for the industry," a common industry posture indicating a willingness to participate in the regulatory process. DraftKings, for its part, referred ProPublica to its prior comments, reiterating its defense against accusations of unfair marketing or targeting vulnerable individuals.
The rules presented by the commission on Friday are a direct outcome of Governor Kathy Hochul’s call earlier this year to address problem gambling. The Governor, currently running for reelection, has also announced a 10-year statewide survey to assess residents’ gambling behavior, aiming to "guide smart, targeted investments that protect New Yorkers and strengthen access to care." This multi-pronged approach underscores the state’s commitment to understanding and mitigating the societal impacts of legalized gambling, although the commission’s initial proposed rules represent a relatively moderate first step in this broader strategy. The measures also call for companies to conduct greater due diligence into a user’s "financial vulnerability" under specific conditions, such as a 50% or more jump in app usage time within a week compared to the preceding two-week period.
The Road Ahead: Public Input and Future Evolution
The introduction of these rules marks a critical juncture in their journey toward formal adoption. The process now moves into a 60-day public comment period, during which individuals, advocacy groups, industry stakeholders, and experts can weigh in on the proposed regulations. This public input phase is crucial for gathering diverse perspectives and identifying potential areas for refinement or further expansion. Barring significant revisions, the rules will then return before the commission for final consideration and approval.
The evolving regulatory landscape in New York and across the United States reflects a delicate balance between the economic benefits of legalized sports betting and the imperative to safeguard public health. As the industry continues its rapid expansion, the tension between maximizing revenue and implementing effective consumer protection measures is likely to intensify. New York’s proactive stance, while acknowledged to have limitations, signifies a critical step toward establishing clearer boundaries for online sportsbooks and holding them to higher standards of responsible gaming. The coming months will reveal whether these proposed rules, and the broader trend of increased regulatory scrutiny, will fundamentally alter the practices of a powerful and rapidly growing industry, ultimately offering more meaningful protection to millions of bettors.
Ana Megawati
Joko Widodo
Eva Lovia
Jia Lissa
Pevita Pearce