A 28-year-old Wyoming woman, Molly Hamby, has been taken into custody in Platte County, facing serious charges of solicitation of first-degree murder and solicitation of forgery. The charges stem from an alleged attempt to persuade a friend to kill her husband during a period of intense marital discord, according to court documents and law enforcement officials. The disturbing plot reportedly came to light when Hamby’s husband discovered incriminating text messages on her phone, revealing a chilling request to "make someone disappear." The incident has cast a spotlight on the volatile dynamics that can emerge from domestic disputes, particularly when fears over child custody become paramount.
The Allegation Unfolds
The narrative began to unravel earlier this month as Molly Hamby and her husband were navigating a difficult phase in their marriage, leading to a temporary separation. Hamby had moved out of their family home in Wheatland, Wyoming. However, on March 21, the couple reportedly agreed to reconcile and work through their issues, prompting Hamby’s return to the residence. It was during this fragile period of attempted reconciliation that a crucial discovery was made. As part of their agreement to mend their relationship, Hamby consented to allow her husband access to her text messages. What he allegedly uncovered sent shockwaves through their lives and immediately prompted him to contact the authorities.
The text messages, later presented to the Platte County Sheriff’s Office, detailed a series of exchanges between Hamby and a long-time friend who also reportedly worked as a private investigator. These conversations, dating back to March 20, the day before Hamby moved back home, allegedly included Hamby telling her friend that she had a "job" for him, but that she preferred not to discuss the details over text. A few messages later, the gravity of her alleged intentions became starkly clear when she reportedly asked, "Can you make someone disappear." The friend’s purported response, "I Can yes," set the stage for the escalating seriousness of the alleged plot.
A Marriage in Crisis: The Background
The backdrop to these grave allegations is a marriage fraught with difficulties. While specific details of the marital issues have not been extensively publicized, court documents indicate a deep-seated fear on Hamby’s part regarding the custody of their three children. Police reports suggest that Hamby expressed extreme anger towards her husband and harbored significant anxiety that he would seek to gain full custody of their children should they proceed with a divorce. This fear, according to investigators, served as the primary alleged motive behind the plot to eliminate her husband.
Platte County, a rural expanse in southeastern Wyoming, with its county seat in Wheatland, is characterized by its close-knit communities. Wheatland, with a population hovering around 3,700, rarely sees crimes of this nature, making the alleged murder-for-hire plot particularly unsettling for local residents. The tight social fabric of such communities often means that criminal events resonate deeply, impacting public perception of safety and trust. The suddenness and severity of the allegations against a local resident like Hamby have undoubtedly created a ripple effect throughout the small town.
The Digital Trail: Text Messages as Key Evidence
The digital footprint left by Molly Hamby’s alleged communications proved to be the linchpin of the investigation. The husband’s discovery of the text messages on March 21 provided immediate and compelling evidence for law enforcement. These messages, as detailed in court documents obtained by Cowboy State Daily, offered a direct window into Hamby’s alleged intentions and the progression of the plot. The seemingly innocuous initial query about a "job" quickly escalated to a request to "make someone disappear," a phrase universally understood in criminal contexts to mean murder.
Investigators from the Wheatland Police Department and the Platte County Sheriff’s Office rapidly leveraged this digital evidence. The preservation and analysis of text messages have become an increasingly critical component in modern criminal investigations, providing tangible proof of intent, communication, and conspiracy. In this case, the text messages not only served as the initial alert to the husband but also formed the foundation upon which police built their case, allowing them to corroborate information and interview relevant parties. The immediate action taken by the husband upon discovering these messages was crucial in potentially preventing a tragic outcome.
The Alleged Plot: From "Job" to "Disappear"
Following the initial text exchanges, Hamby and her friend allegedly arranged to meet in person at an auto parts store. While the precise details of their conversation at this meeting have not been fully disclosed, the friend later provided crucial information to police. After this meeting, Hamby allegedly sent another urgent message: "[W]e need to get this done today if possible he has threaten[ed] to take kids away from me a few times," adding, "He can[‘]t have my kids." This message underscored the immediacy and desperation behind her alleged actions, directly linking the plot to her fears regarding child custody.
Investigators report that Hamby allegedly provided her friend with specific details about her husband’s whereabouts on March 20, the very day she reportedly initiated the conversation about "making someone disappear." This level of detail, according to law enforcement, indicates a calculated and deliberate attempt to facilitate the alleged murder. The combination of direct requests, the friend’s affirmative response, the in-person meeting, and the provision of specific logistical information paints a grim picture of the alleged planning involved.
Law Enforcement Intervention and Confession
Upon receiving the alarming text messages from Hamby’s husband on March 22, the Platte County Sheriff’s Office launched an immediate investigation. Their first step was to interview Hamby’s friend, the individual allegedly solicited for the crime. Initially, the friend reportedly claimed that Hamby had asked him to act as a bodyguard. However, under further questioning, he allegedly admitted that during their in-person meeting, the discussion had veered towards "hurting" Hamby’s husband. He also revealed that Hamby had allegedly asked for his help in forging her husband’s signature on paperwork for a motorcycle title, leading to the additional charge of solicitation of forgery.

Later, when police interviewed Molly Hamby herself, she initially reiterated the claim that she had sought her friend’s "help and protection." However, when confronted with the unequivocal text messages where she asked her friend to make her husband "disappear," Hamby reportedly admitted to wanting her husband murdered. She allegedly confessed to being "extremely mad" at her husband and driven by the overwhelming fear that he would take their three children if they divorced. This confession, combined with the digital evidence and the friend’s statements, solidified the case against her. Following her interview, Hamby was arrested and formally charged with solicitation of first-degree murder and solicitation of forgery. She is currently held at the Platte County Jail, awaiting further legal proceedings. Her next court date has not been made publicly available.
Legal Ramifications: Charges and Penalties
Molly Hamby faces two felony charges, both carrying significant legal consequences in Wyoming.
- Solicitation of First-Degree Murder: This charge implies that Hamby allegedly requested, commanded, or attempted to induce another person to commit first-degree murder. In Wyoming, first-degree murder is defined as intentionally and with premeditation causing the death of another human being. Solicitation to commit such a grave offense is treated with extreme seriousness by the legal system, reflecting the intent to cause the most severe harm. A conviction for solicitation of first-degree murder typically carries a substantial prison sentence, potentially decades, underscoring the severity of the alleged plot.
- Solicitation of Forgery: This charge relates to Hamby’s alleged request for her friend to help forge her husband’s signature on motorcycle title paperwork. Forgery, generally defined as creating a false document or altering a real one with the intent to defraud, is also a serious felony. Solicitation to commit forgery means Hamby allegedly asked or encouraged another to commit this crime. While less severe than the murder solicitation charge, it still carries potential prison time and significant fines.
These charges highlight the state’s robust legal framework designed to deter and punish individuals who attempt to orchestrate violent crimes, even if the actual act is not carried out. The focus of solicitation charges is on the intent and the act of inducement, rather than the completion of the solicited crime.
The Role of the "Friend" and the Uncharged Status
Crucially, Hamby’s friend, who also worked as a private investigator, has not been charged in connection with the alleged murder-for-hire plot, according to Cowboy State Daily. This fact suggests that the friend likely cooperated fully with law enforcement, providing critical details that corroborated the text messages and Hamby’s subsequent confession. In many criminal investigations, individuals who are initially implicated but then cooperate extensively with police may receive immunity or have charges dropped or not filed, especially if their cooperation is pivotal to solving the case or securing a conviction against the primary suspect.
The friend’s initial conflicting statements—first claiming a bodyguard role, then admitting to discussions of "hurting" the husband—are common in the early stages of police interviews, where individuals may be hesitant or fearful. However, his eventual detailed account proved instrumental. His profession as a private investigator adds another layer of complexity, raising questions about professional ethics and conduct within that field. His cooperation was likely a key factor in law enforcement’s ability to quickly piece together the alleged plot and take decisive action.
Broader Context: Domestic Disputes and Murder-for-Hire Cases
The alleged actions of Molly Hamby, driven by fears over child custody in a dissolving marriage, tragically illustrate the extreme and dangerous escalations that can occur in domestic disputes. While most marital separations, even contentious ones, do not lead to such violent alleged plots, the underlying stressors—emotional distress, financial strain, and particularly child custody battles—are common catalysts for conflict. Statistics from organizations focused on family law and domestic violence often highlight the intense emotional toll these situations take on individuals, sometimes leading to irrational or desperate acts.
Murder-for-hire cases, though relatively rare, garner significant public attention due to their calculated nature and the betrayal of trust they often involve. Such cases are complex, requiring prosecutors to prove intent, the act of solicitation, and often, specific overt acts taken to further the plot. The use of digital communication as evidence has become increasingly prevalent in these cases, providing a clear and traceable record of alleged criminal intent. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, among other organizations, frequently points to child custody disputes as a particularly high-risk factor in domestic conflicts, sometimes leading to severe outcomes.
Impact on Family and Community
The immediate and long-term implications of these alleged actions extend far beyond Molly Hamby and her husband. The couple’s three children are undoubtedly the most vulnerable victims, facing the profound trauma of having one parent allegedly plot against the other, and now dealing with the incarceration of their mother. Child protective services and family courts will likely be involved in determining the safest and most stable environment for their upbringing, a process that can be emotionally arduous and prolonged.
For the community of Wheatland, an incident of this magnitude can disrupt the sense of security and trust. While such crimes are statistically uncommon, their impact on a small town is often disproportionately large, fostering discussions about domestic safety, mental health resources, and the effectiveness of conflict resolution mechanisms. Law enforcement and judicial officials face the responsibility of upholding justice while also reassuring the public of their commitment to maintaining peace and order.
The Road Ahead: Judicial Process
As Molly Hamby remains in custody, the legal process will now unfold through the Wyoming court system. This will involve an arraignment, where she will formally enter a plea, followed by pre-trial hearings to address evidentiary matters, motions, and potentially plea negotiations. Given the serious nature of the charges, it is anticipated that the prosecution will pursue a vigorous case. Hamby is entitled to legal representation and is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence, including the crucial text messages and her alleged confession, will be central to the prosecution’s efforts. The outcome of this case will not only determine Molly Hamby’s future but also serve as a stark reminder of the severe consequences for those who allegedly resort to extreme measures in times of personal crisis.








